You are reading

City Council Passes ‘Awnings Act’, Protects Business Owners From Hefty Fines for Non-Compliant Signs

Council Members Rafael Espinal and Peter Koo joined merchants in Flushing Tuesday to rally in support of the Awnings Act (Photo: Koo)

Jan. 11, 2019 By Christian Murray

The City Council passed legislation Wednesday that aims to protect business owners from hefty fines for failing to comply with obscure rules that govern the display of storefront awnings.

Small business owners throughout the city have been hit with fines of up to $6,000 for not following the letter of the law concerning their store awnings. The fines have dealt with failing to get a permit to erect them to the wrong sized font.

The Department of Buildings has imposed the fines after receiving a raft of 311 complaints. Many of the non-compliant business owners, who had their signs up for years, had no idea they were in breach of code. The rules are extremely specific and include how far an awning can be from the sidewalk to the size of the font.

The legislation, called the Awnings Act, passed the council 45 to 1 and all outstanding fines will be waived once Mayor Bill de Blasio signs the bill into law.

The bill puts a 2-year moratorium on the DOB’s ability to issue fines relating to the signs. Furthermore, the DOB would be required to develop an education program for the business owners and review the existing rules.

In recent months, business owners in heavily-hit areas have been tearing down their signs in fear that they will be subject to huge fines, which could force them to close.

The DOB has not had a deliberate campaign to conduct an awning blitz. Instead the agency has acted in response to complaints, which have been clustered in specific commercial districts. Areas such as Bay Ridge and Ditmars Park, Brooklyn, and Flushing have been hit hard.

The number of 311 complaints concerning business signage/awnings doubled in 2018 vs 2017, according to city data. From Nov. 1, 2017 until present, there were 2,069 complaints–with 1,119 in Brooklyn followed by 512 in Queens.

Dozens of business owners on Union Street in Flushing have removed their signs. The corridor has become a barren strip of exposed brick and cement awnings.

Council Member Rafael Espinal, who represents the 37th District in Brooklyn, said that business owners in his area began being hit with fines about two years ago. He said that it has caused great hardship, since not only are the fines steep but the business owners have to pay for a replacement sign.

Caitlin Kelmar, a spokesperson for Espinal, told the Queens Post that a local sign maker was the source of the 311 complaints—as a means to drum up some business.

Espinal put together the legislation about a year ago but initially didn’t get much in the way of support until business owners in other parts of the city were also getting fined.

On Tuesday, Espinal and Council Member Peter Koo held a rally in Flushing to bring attention to the bill.

“This legislation is about delivering relief to small businesses,” Espinal said. “Walk up Fulton Street in my district, or here in Flushing, and you can see first-hand the toll that this enforcement blitz has taken on our mom-and-pop shops and family-owned restaurants.”

email the author: [email protected]

6 Comments

George

If we construct a border wall none of this would ever happen !!!! Awnings and immigration are like peanut butter and jelly !!

1
16
Reply
wat

Yep, as soon as Mexico pays for it we should be good to go lmao. Trump Shutdown is the longest in history.

14
Reply
Sara Ross

The fines are just a bullying tactic by the DOB and the city to get money out of small business owners! Leave them alone and let them make a living!

1
1
Reply
Midtowngirl

Why are businesses allowed to put up storefront awnings in other languages and without any English? To me it means they do not want you to use their business unless you speak that particular language or are of a particular ethnicity. Sorry but Asians seem to be doing this the most. Even on residences or real estate adds. That is discrimation. Why is this being accepted and brushed over by the city?

4
33
Reply
ralph

That wasn’t the point. It wasn’t that signage was posted in other languages exclusively without English, it was more the issue of technicalities, like the size of the font, the distance of the awning from the building to the sidewalk. In essence, it was all the work of one particular sign maker who wanted to drum up his own business by penalizing all the other businesses around him in their noncompliance of an old byzantine set of arcane sign rules. I agree that all signs should have their title and address in English, as it is an absolute necessity for delivery of vital emergency services. However, I would have wished that this article have included the name of the sign maker who made all these complaints, so that people who needed new signs could boycott his business, as a way of paying him back.

Reply
Sara Ross

Midtown Girl

I remember a few years ago the people who live in or near Flushing complained that the Asians who opened businesses just had their signs in their languages so that if you spoke English (this is still America, I think) you had no idea what the store sold. The business owners in Flushing then changed their signs. It amazes me that people who come here are allowed to vote and get a driver’s license when their English is very little – not all, but most.

1
23
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News