You are reading

City Planning Commission Votes in Favor of Flushing Waterfront Development

A rendering of the proposed Special Flushing Waterfront District (Image Courtesy Hill West Architects)

Nov. 5, 2020 By Allie Griffin

The New York City Planning Commission voted in support of a contentious Flushing waterfront development project Wednesday.

The City Planning Commission voted 11-to-two in favor of a zoning change that would make way for a 13-tower, mixed-use development that includes office space, hotel buildings and 1,725 apartments.

The land use application was filed in December 2019 by a consortium of real estate firms called FWRA that seek to rezone a 29-acre area of land on the Flushing Creek in order for them to construct their ambitious project.

The developers hope to establish a “Special Flushing Waterfront District,” which is bound by 36th Avenue to the north, College Point Boulevard to the east and Roosevelt Avenue to the south.

The proposal was praised by City Planning Commission Chair Marisa Lago who noted that it would bring jobs and prompt economic activity. However, other commissioners expressed concern about gentrification and how it might price out existing residents.

“This proposal will assist the city as it recovers and emerges stronger from the pandemic by allowing downtown Flushing to embrace its waterfront and make this natural resource publicly available…,” Lago said at the meeting. “This application is an important step forward for Flushing.”

The waterfront district application, however, did not garner unanimous support. The two commissioners who voted no argued that it would spur gentrification in Flushing and displace current residents.

Commissioner Michelle de la Uz voiced her dissent over what she called the “laughable” number of affordable housing units included in the plan.

The plan calls for the creation of 75 to 90 affordable units out of the 1,725 apartments. While the number meets the city’s rezoning requirements, de la Uz said it wasn’t enough to meet the community’s needs.

“The proposal falls far short of committing to meet the affordable housing and public school seat needs for the area — 75 to 90 MIH [Mandatory Inclusionary Housing] units is laughable considering the size of this project,” de la Uz said.

Commissioner Orlando Marín said he concurred with de la Uz’s misgivings and also voted no.

Meanwhile, Commissioners Anna Hayes Levin and Raj Rampershad voted in favor of the project, but said they hoped to see the plans modified to include more affordable housing units as the land use application heads to the City Council next.

The City Council now has 50 days to hold a hearing and vote on the land use application. The Council Subcommittee on Zoning and Franchises will host a public hearing on the application on Monday, Nov. 9 at 10 a.m.

The redevelopment proposal has received heavy criticism from some local community-based groups and residents.

Several civic groups, including MinKwon Center for Community Action, the Greater Flushing Chamber of Commerce and Chhaya CDC oppose the rezoning project. The groups say an influx of luxury buildings would intensify gentrification and lead to the displacement of many Flushing residents.

The MinKwon Center panned the City Planning Commission in a tweet, arguing that it doesn’t listen to the community.

The Flushing waterfront proposal was approved by Community Board 7 earlier this year, much to the dismay of many of these groups who expressed concerns at the time about gentrification.

However, the redevelopment plan was later rejected by Acting Queens Borough President Sharon Lee.

Lee, in her advisory role, said the project would displace long-time residents — many of whom are elderly and live on fixed incomes.

Meanwhile, Council Member Peter Koo, whose district includes the Flushing waterfront, has yet to make any public statements on the redevelopment proposal.

The project developers praised the City Planning Commission for its support of their proposal.

“As the owners behind the project, who have worked tirelessly for years to see this project come to fruition, this vote marks another step in the right direction,” FWRA said in a statement. “City Planning rightly sees that the SWFD is not a rezoning, but an essential next step for Queens at large towards recovery.”

The FWRA consortium — composed of F&T Group, United Construction and Development Group Inc. and Young Nian Group — said the Special Flushing Waterfront District will create nearly 3,000 permanent jobs and $164 million in project annual tax revenue.

“Without question, the months since COVID-19 have been among the most trying times our city has ever seen,” FWRA said. “There is no better time to give Flushing and New York City this exciting new chapter.”

email the author: news@queenspost.com

One Comment

Click for Comments 
ASensibleMan

I’d like to know how much under-the-table money was involved here. Typical Chinese way to do business. NYC is the most corrupt city on planet earth.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Urgent manhunt underway for ‘animal’ who allegedly raped a 13-year-old girl in Flushing park on Thursday: NYPD

The NYPD announced a $10,000 reward is being offered for information that leads to the arrest of a Hispanic man who allegedly raped a 13-year-old girl in a wooded area of Kissena Corridor Park on Thursday afternoon.

More than sixty investigators were at the crime scene late into the night. During a press briefing by NYPD brass on Friday, Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey said that the manhunt was expanded city-wide and that the department would spare no expense until the suspect was apprehended.

Southeast Queens man arraigned on weapons charges after cops search his ‘ghost car’ near LaGuardia Airport: DA

A Hollis man was criminally charged after police discovered a cache of weapons in his vehicle during a traffic stop. He was pulled over for driving a “ghost car” with obscured license plates in East Elmhurst near LaGuardia Airport during the early morning hours of June 12.

Judd Sanson, 27, of Jamaica Avenue, was ordered held without bail after he was arraigned in Queens Criminal Court on Thursday afternoon on a criminal complaint charging him with multiple counts of weapons possession, unlawful possession of pistol or revolver ammunition, and unlawful use of a police uniform or emblem and other crimes after the arsenal was found in his SUV.

Man sought for raping 13-year-old girl in Flushing park in broad daylight Thursday: NYPD

An urgent manhunt is underway in Northeast Queens after a Hispanic man allegedly raped a 13-year-old girl at knifepoint in Kissena Corridor Park in broad daylight on Thursday afternoon.

Police from the 109th Precinct in Flushing reported that the youngster was with a 13-year-old boy in the park near Kalmia Avenue and Colden Street at around 3:30 p.m. when a stranger approached and threatened them with a knife, forcing them both into a wooded section where he tied them up. The perpetrator proceeded to forcibly remove their cell phones before sexually assaulting the girl, police said, adding that he fled in an unknown direction.