You are reading

Council Committee Overwhelmingly Backs Flushing Waterfront Development, Votes 14-to-1

Special Flushing Waterfront District rendering (Courtesy of FWRA)

Dec. 9, 2020 By Allie Griffin

The proposed 13-tower, mixed-use development on the Flushing waterfront is a step closer toward becoming a reality.

The City Council’s Land Use Committee overwhelmingly voted to approve a zoning change that is needed for the ambitious project to move ahead.

The committee voted 14-to-1 to approve the land use application that calls for a 29-acre “Special Flushing Waterfront District.” Only Brooklyn Council Member Inez Barron voted against the project.

The application will go before the full city council for a final vote Thursday. However, now that it has the backing of the Land Use Committee, it is likely that the full council will approve it.

The committee held the vote today, after having negotiated an agreement between the applicant FWRA — a consortium of three developers that each own a portion of the 29 acre district — and union leaders last night.

FWRA reached an agreement with the 32BJ Service Employees International Union and the New York Hotel & Motels Trades Council to provide hundreds of residential, building service and hotel jobs at the project.

The two influential unions had urged the city council to vote against the application prior to the agreement.

“I’m really happy to announce that last night we reached an agreement with labor groups and the applicants that will include union jobs in the Special Flushing Waterfront District with both 32BJ and the Hotel Trades Council,” said Flushing Council Member Peter Koo, who sits on the Land Use committee and voted for the zoning application.

Koo has expressed support for the Flushing project for some time — citing how it would transform the barren industrial land into a publicly accessible waterfront for downtown Flushing. The project would bring 1,725 apartments, multiple hotels, office and retail space as well as a brand new road network and 2.8 acres of public waterfront space.

Dept. of City Planning

Koo’s support is vital, since the council traditionally votes in accordance with the wishes of the member who represents the district where the rezoning is proposed.

The lack of union support had been a stumbling block prior to the union agreement. The limited number of affordable housing units — just 75 to 90 out of 1,725 units – within the proposal was another obstacle several council members took issue with.

However, Koo said FWRA has since agreed to continue talks about adding additional affordable units — though he didn’t provide a specific number.

The developers have agreed to continue conversations with the New York City Department of Housing and Preservation (HPD), which manages the city’s stock of affordable housing, over the next three years, he said.

“Importantly, the applicants have entered into an agreement with the city to further engage in discussions over the next three years with HPD and the Council to work on ways to secure financing so we can maximize the amount of affordable housing on site,” Koo said at the committee meeting.

FWRA’s plans for 75 to 90 affordable units meets the rezoning requirements, but several council members want to see the number increased.

Last month, Council Member Francisco Moya, Chair of the Zoning Subcommittee, and 11 other council members said in a joint statement that they wouldn’t vote to approve the project as it stood at that point – given the lack of union support and the number of affordable units.

Three of the members who signed the statement–Moya and Council Members Diana Ayala and Carlina Rivera – sit on the Land Use committee and voted today to approve the application.

Moya is one of five Queens council members on the committee and all approved it. The others are Koo, Adrienne Adams, Barry Grodenchik, I. Daneek Miller and Antonio Reynoso.

However, Reynoso, who represents parts of Ridgewood, Bushwick and Williamsburg, said in a statement that he had voted for “the lesser of two evils,” saying that what the developers can build as of right is less desirable.

“This is definitely a lesser of two evils vote and I am uncomfortable with it, however the as-of-right scenario is clearly the worse option and I am therefore voting yes on this application,” Reynoso said.

The developers said without the council’s approval of their land use application, they would instead build on the waterfront site as-of-right — and include no affordable housing units and few community benefits.

Reynoso said the project is not a true win for Flushing as it “does absolutely nothing to dig us out of our housing crisis.”

However, the need for well-paying jobs during an economic crisis pushed him to vote yes on the Special Flushing Waterfront District, he said.

The project is estimated to bring in about $116 million in property tax revenue for the city in addition to the hundreds of jobs.

Koo said the revenue will help Flushing’s economy recover.

“As our city comes to terms with a second wave of COVID-19, rising unemployment, and a faltering economy, this project has the potential to revitalize the downtown Flushing economy at a time when we need it most,” he said in a statement. “Our community has suffered long before COVID ever reached our shores. Now is the time to rebuild.”

FWRA has previously said it would break ground on the project as soon as it gets the go-ahead from the city council. The development could be completed as soon as 2025.

email the author: [email protected]

One Comment

Click for Comments 
Larry Penner

Pre-Covid19, 66,000 NYC Transit subway riders utilized the Flushing Main Street #7 station. Rush hour express trains depart with every seat occupied with many having to stand for a 25 to 30 minute ride to Grand Central and Hudson Yards stations. When there are periodic service disruptions due to signal problems or inclement weather, platforms and departing trains quickly become over crowded. Just how would this key transportation asset handle several thousand potential new riders as a result of this new development? If you believe in Global Warming and Climate Change, why would you build a new large development on waterfront property? Who will pay for improvements and upgrades to the existing underground utilities including water, sewer, gas, electric, steam, cable and other infrastructure which is already overwhelmed to accommodate this new development? What about the cost of additional fire, library, police, schools, sanitation and other municipal services?

Are there any conflicts of interest between the developers, their consultants and lobbyists, construction contractors and unions who might benefit by the project who have made campaign contributions to elected officials who support this project?

Larry Penner — Transportation advocate, historian and writer who previously worked for the Federal Transit Administration Region 2 New York Office. This included the development, review, approval and oversight for billions in capital projects and programs for the MTA, NYC Transit, Long Island Rail Road, Metro North Rail Road, MTA Bus along with 30 other transit agencies in NY & NJ) .


Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

BP launches new advisory panel for youth to become civically engaged in the future of Queens

In an effort to get more young people involved in civics, Queens Borough President Donovan Richards has created a new advisory panel known as the Youth and Young Adult Council to introduce the “youngest and fiercest” community advocates to both community service and organization.

Members of the advisory body will advocate concerns through means of community engagement by participating in one of two cohorts. The first will be made up of high school representatives between the ages of 13 and 17, while the second cohort will be comprised of young adults between the ages of 18 and 25.

‘Where do we go now?’ Michaels set to close its doors in Fresh Meadows next month

The Michaels located at 187-04 Horace Harding Expwy. in Fresh Meadows will be permanently closing its doors on Feb. 23. The announcement that Michaels will be leaving the Fresh Meadows Shopping Center has led to an outpouring of reactions from many community members.

“We know this is disappointing to our customers in Queens, but we hope to continue to serve them at our other locations in New York City or online at,” a spokesperson for Michaels said in a statement to

Queens senator holds Lunar New Year celebration at Tangram in Flushing

Hundreds of revelers joined state Senator John Liu for a Lunar New Year celebration Friday night at Tangram in Downtown Flushing. The event featured free food from 25 local restaurants, as well as musical and cultural performances and giveaways.

Liu was joined at the event by several local leaders, including Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz, Assemblyman Edward Braunstein, Councilwomen Sandra Ung and Linda Lee and many more. Many of the leaders spoke about the importance of this celebration to the Queens community as they celebrated the start of the Year of the Rabbit.

These Queens eateries are participating in the upcoming NYC Restaurant Week

NYC Restaurant Week is underway, so nix that skillet and bring family and friends to your favorite neighborhood spot, or get inspired and break bread somewhere new and different. During this special citywide culinary event, food-lovers will enjoy curated menus and prix-fixe prices that are easy on the wallet.

Bookings began on Jan. 17 and are available until Feb. 12, and you can reserve a table at 30 participating Queens restaurants, along with hundreds more across the five boroughs.

Flushing BID launches free online raffle to support local businesses in the community

The Flushing Business Improvement District (BID), on Friday, Jan. 20, announced the launch of Lucky7, a free online raffle to celebrate the Lunar New Year, promote local businesses, and bring shoppers from other regions to downtown Flushing. 

“This event is to celebrate the culture in Downtown Flushing. The food culture, shopping culture, but most importantly to celebrate the Lunar New Year culture in Downtown Flushing,” said Dian Yu, executive director of the Flushing BID. “This is a unique opportunity for people not familiar with Downtown Flushing to truly experience the food and fun that’s only available in Flushing.”

Queens lawmaker reintroduces legislation to make Lunar New Year a federal holiday

As the Asian American community prepares to begin celebrating Lunar New Year on Sunday, Jan. 22, Queens Congresswoman Grace Meng on Friday reintroduced a package of legislation to commemorate the holiday. 

Meng’s legislative Lunar New Year package includes the Lunar New Year Day Act, which would establish Lunar New Year as the 12th federal holiday recognized across the United States. It also includes a resolution, “Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of Lunar New Year,” that commemorates the long history and explains the cultural importance of the holiday. 

Lunar New Year ‘special celebration’ held at Queensborough Community College in Bayside

Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz joined Councilwomen Sandra Ung and Linda Lee on Wednesday, Jan. 18, for a special celebration in honor of the Lunar New Year at the Student Union Building at Queensborough Community College in Bayside.

Ung escaped the Cambodian genocide as a child, and her family emigrated to the United States when she was 7 years old. Now she represents Flushing with its enormous Asian American population. She said she is proud to see how many Lunar New Year celebrations she sees around the city compared to when she first arrived in Queens.

BP Richards, local leaders speak with small business owners in Flushing in effort to improve the neighborhood

Queens Borough President Donovan Richards joined several Queens leaders Wednesday morning for a walking tour through Flushing to get input from the community on how to improve the neighborhood.

The Jan. 18 tour comes in the wake of public safety concerns in downtown Flushing. While crime was a main concern among the business owners Richards spoke with Wednesday, there were other areas they wished to see improvements in across the area, including traffic and sanitation issues.