You are reading

Queens Council Members Urge de Blasio to Keep Gifted and Talented Programs

Queens elected officials urged the city to keep gifted and talented programs in New York public schools. (Council Member Peter Koo ‘s Twitter)

Sept. 5, 2019 By Shane O’Brien

Elected officials in Queens have urged Mayor Bill de Blasio not to scrap gifted and talented programs in New York public schools following a recommendation from a mayoral advisory group last week to end the program.

Council Members Peter Koo, Robert Holden, Karen Koslowitz, Adrienne Adams, Barry Grodenchik and Paul Vallone all signed a letter addressed to the mayor and Chancellor Richard Carranza imploring them to keep the program as it ensures that high achieving students have access to rigorous and challenging curricula.

The letter was circulated through the City Council by Council Member Robert Cornegy Jr of Bed-Stuy and Crown Heights in Brooklyn and has so far been signed by 14 Council Members across New York City.

A high-level panel, dubbed the School Diversity Advisory Group, last week recommended that gifted and talented programs be phased out of New York public schools, arguing that they are outdated and exclusive.

However, the group of Council Members argue that the programs should be expanded, not ended. The group would like to see gifted and talented programs added to more schools in New York and argued that there should be additional on-ramps for the program, like exams at third and seventh grade levels.

Currently, admission to New York gifted and talented elementary school programs is based on a composite exam students take before beginning kindergarten, when they are just four years old.

The mayoral panel said in its review of the programs that they are too exclusive and have led to segregated public schools in New York on par with Alabama and Mississippi.

It found that over 80 percent of kindergartners to receive an offer to a gifted and talented program in 2017-2018 were either white or Asian. Hispanic and black kindergartners made up just 18 percent of the programs in the same year, despite making up 65 percent of all kindergartners.

The panel recommended phasing out gifted and talented programs and screened schools and replacing them with non-selective magnet schools, which are based on the needs and interests of students.

However Council Member Koo said that gifted and talented programs could not be blamed for a lack of diversity in New York schools and argued that they aren’t present in many communities of color.

“It is disingenuous to blame Gifted and Talented programs for a lack of diversity when G&T programs don’t even exist in many communities of color,” Koo said.

“If the administration is serious about increasing diversity in these programs, it should expand G&T into underserved school districts and give more students of color a fair and equal chance to compete.”

Meanwhile, Council Member Grodenchik said that ending gifted and talented programs would drive parents out of the city’s public school system, creating even more segregation.

“Instead of phasing out gifted and talented programs, we should be adding more such programs across the city.” Grodenchik said. “There are gifted children in every neighborhood, and it is our job to provide the programs that will truly support and elevate them.”

email the author: [email protected]

3 Comments

Laura Ally

Come on BDB. We all know this is the #1 thing people care about. Are you in a G&T area and impacted by this? Let us and others know at Gohomeny.com. Rate your apartment building, let us know its boons and busts!

Reply
CG

there is nothing divisive or “unfair” about admistering the same exams to the same age group of children…. The 80% white and asian says less about segregation and fairness than it does about natural aptitude…. The fact of the matter is your kid is either exceptionally smart or they aren’t… everyone wants and thinks their kid is special, but the fact of the matter there will always be kids with more or less aptitude… Should we say that the majority of sports scholarships go to a particular segment of children and that this is unfair… shouldn’t kids with little or no physical aptitude be granted scholarships or awards simply because its not fair how things shake out on the field of play… ? Come on people, the world needs ditch diggers and fast food workers too. Not every kid is capable of grasping advanced calculus or engineering the next spaceship. Your kid either has what it takes or they don’t why penalize white and asian kids for being smart. Any child of color who scores well enough on the G&T exams is given their place in the program – so nobody is being discriminated against on any basis other than their performance on a standardized aptitude test. The same type of elimination they face when applying for college, grad school, law school, Medical School etc… if you don’t score high enough you do NOT get a seat. it’s that simple. These kids will have to test and demonstrate ability and knowledge throughout their lives, so why is this any different.

Reply
Stay Loose

I was in a gifted class and it harmed me. It creates unrealistic expectations, especially for children who are twice exceptional: gifted plus ASD or ADHD, without the supports for those students. I grew up thinking that I had to know all the answers on my own and discouraged teamwork and collegiality. It set me up for failures in middle school, high school, college and careers that took therapy and many years to undo. Yes, I learned a lot, but I believe I would have been healthier and more successful if I had been in heterogeneous class such as the ones that my children are thriving in.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News